<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Inside</title>
	<atom:link href="http://elephantwords.co.uk/2009/11/05/inside/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://elephantwords.co.uk/2009/11/05/inside/</link>
	<description>One Image, Six Writers, Daily Words. The site about Interpretation, Inspiration and Improvisation.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 24 May 2012 07:53:48 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.2</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Rivka Jacobs</title>
		<link>http://elephantwords.co.uk/2009/11/05/inside/#comment-20388</link>
		<dc:creator>Rivka Jacobs</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 16 Nov 2009 00:05:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://elephantwords.co.uk/?p=3006#comment-20388</guid>
		<description>Oh, that was good. I read this several times. I read it when you first posted it, and then just now again. (Sorry for the delay in Commenting.)

This is a layered monolog; you start with a warning to the reader that you will be exposing a cliche in favor or the truth. But then you distract us with that &quot;Norman Rockwell&quot; vision of Christmas and families. I&#039;m reading this and thinking, &quot;Say what?&quot; 

But then you begin to unravel the cliche, pull back the layers of falsity. 

Expertly done. 

From &quot;troubles&quot; and &quot;dust ups&quot; but they &quot;have to take you in,&quot; to, the stateent &quot;But that&#039;s not how it works,&quot; and the narrator explains to us exactly how it does work. 

The imagery of the fish at the end, reflecting the Christmas drive-by inside-outside imagery above, then finishes up the journey to the truth; or the truth as the narrator sees it. The fish can&#039;t breath &quot;out there,&quot; and HAS to stay &quot;inside,&quot; or he&#039;ll die. The narrator has converted the human family into a different species from himself. He&#039;s the human being because he has chosen freedom. 

At least that&#039;s what I got out of the story! This resonates with me, so I&#039;m probably seeing what I need to see. But that&#039;s the mark of a great piece of writing, it means what it has to mean, to different readers.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Oh, that was good. I read this several times. I read it when you first posted it, and then just now again. (Sorry for the delay in Commenting.)</p>
<p>This is a layered monolog; you start with a warning to the reader that you will be exposing a cliche in favor or the truth. But then you distract us with that &#8220;Norman Rockwell&#8221; vision of Christmas and families. I&#8217;m reading this and thinking, &#8220;Say what?&#8221; </p>
<p>But then you begin to unravel the cliche, pull back the layers of falsity. </p>
<p>Expertly done. </p>
<p>From &#8220;troubles&#8221; and &#8220;dust ups&#8221; but they &#8220;have to take you in,&#8221; to, the stateent &#8220;But that&#8217;s not how it works,&#8221; and the narrator explains to us exactly how it does work. </p>
<p>The imagery of the fish at the end, reflecting the Christmas drive-by inside-outside imagery above, then finishes up the journey to the truth; or the truth as the narrator sees it. The fish can&#8217;t breath &#8220;out there,&#8221; and HAS to stay &#8220;inside,&#8221; or he&#8217;ll die. The narrator has converted the human family into a different species from himself. He&#8217;s the human being because he has chosen freedom. </p>
<p>At least that&#8217;s what I got out of the story! This resonates with me, so I&#8217;m probably seeing what I need to see. But that&#8217;s the mark of a great piece of writing, it means what it has to mean, to different readers.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Andrew Cheverton</title>
		<link>http://elephantwords.co.uk/2009/11/05/inside/#comment-20333</link>
		<dc:creator>Andrew Cheverton</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 13 Nov 2009 16:48:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://elephantwords.co.uk/?p=3006#comment-20333</guid>
		<description>Lovely expansion of your back-and-forth dialogue-as-story experiments, Cyn. This works, I think, even better for its diatribe effect.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Lovely expansion of your back-and-forth dialogue-as-story experiments, Cyn. This works, I think, even better for its diatribe effect.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Nicolas Papaconstantinou</title>
		<link>http://elephantwords.co.uk/2009/11/05/inside/#comment-20245</link>
		<dc:creator>Nicolas Papaconstantinou</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 09 Nov 2009 12:03:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://elephantwords.co.uk/?p=3006#comment-20245</guid>
		<description>Oh, awesome, Cyn... Didn&#039;t know where you were going with it, but that final paragraph just brings it all together for me.

Utterly depressing but lovely writing.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Oh, awesome, Cyn&#8230; Didn&#8217;t know where you were going with it, but that final paragraph just brings it all together for me.</p>
<p>Utterly depressing but lovely writing.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

