<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Between The Lines</title>
	<atom:link href="http://elephantwords.co.uk/2009/03/27/betweenthelines/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://elephantwords.co.uk/2009/03/27/betweenthelines/</link>
	<description>One Image, Six Writers, Daily Words. The site about Interpretation, Inspiration and Improvisation.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 12 Mar 2010 01:41:21 -0500</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.4</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: iansharman</title>
		<link>http://elephantwords.co.uk/2009/03/27/betweenthelines/#comment-13595</link>
		<dc:creator>iansharman</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 07 Apr 2009 14:16:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://elephantwords.co.uk/?p=1666#comment-13595</guid>
		<description>I couldn&#039;t agree more. I knew this didn&#039;t entirely work at the time, and you&#039;ve hit the nail on the head as to why.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I couldn&#8217;t agree more. I knew this didn&#8217;t entirely work at the time, and you&#8217;ve hit the nail on the head as to why.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Nicolas Papaconstantinou</title>
		<link>http://elephantwords.co.uk/2009/03/27/betweenthelines/#comment-13592</link>
		<dc:creator>Nicolas Papaconstantinou</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 07 Apr 2009 13:22:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://elephantwords.co.uk/?p=1666#comment-13592</guid>
		<description>An interesting format on this one, Ian - I think it worked - but by the skin of it&#039;s teeth, maybe!

Technically, it&#039;s all cool, but enough of what&#039;s in the second part is already right there in the first part on a read-through that the conceit almost works as a simple retread...

The idea is great, but it might be a bigger format than the plot contained in it!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>An interesting format on this one, Ian &#8211; I think it worked &#8211; but by the skin of it&#8217;s teeth, maybe!</p>
<p>Technically, it&#8217;s all cool, but enough of what&#8217;s in the second part is already right there in the first part on a read-through that the conceit almost works as a simple retread&#8230;</p>
<p>The idea is great, but it might be a bigger format than the plot contained in it!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
